FTR#346—Pearl Harbor Meets the Reichstag Fire, Part III—Nation Building by the
Underground Reich—(Two 30-minute segments)
(Sources are noted in parentheses.)
(Recorded on 2/3/2002.)
This
program continues analysis of the domestic political and economic implications
of the 9/11/2001 terror attacks. (For
more about the attacks see FTR#’s
325-345. Note: FTR#’s 260-315, FTR#325 and succeeding programs are streaming on Real Audio at www.wfmu.org/daveemory. FTR#’s
01-270 are available for download
only, also on Real Audio, at http://archive.wfmu.org:5555/archive/DX/.)
Note: Users of this website are emphatically
encouraged to create a word document out of the program descriptions and do a
“search” on individual subjects in order to more completely reference those
items.
Note: Users of this website (as well as the two
WFMU web addresses noted above) are emphatically
encouraged to use the internet to disseminate as much of the audio and printed material as possible. It is
all FREE
It
is important to note that the distinction between the domestic and foreign
policy implications of the incidents is, to a considerable extent,
academic. Mr. Emory notes that the
attacks (conceptualized from a military/foreign policy standpoint) are
inextricably linked with their domestic impact. The foreign policy and military implications are be discussed in FTR#344. As the title of the broadcast indicates, the attacks can be
accurately considered as a sneak attack by a foreign power—what Mr. Emory calls
“the Underground Reich” and its Fifth Column in the United States national
security establishment. (For more on
this Fifth Column and its role in the attacks, see FTR#’s 326, 328, 331, 332, 333, 334, 336, 337, 339, 341, 343, 345. For historical and political tributaries
connecting the Bush family political milieu with that of the Japanese attack on
Pearl Harbor, see FTR#291.) The 9/11/2001 attack can also be viewed as
promoting the domestic political and police powers of the seated political
interests. The fact that the 9/11
attacks have been followed by the passage of sweeping law enforcement and
intelligence provisions which may be
used to abridge the constitutional freedoms of American citizens and to stifle legitimate political dissent is not to
be overlooked. The fundamental thesis
of FTR#346 (as well as that of FTR#345) is that, in addition to being
an attack on the United States by the Underground Reich, the September 11
assaults constitute “nation building” in this country by the Bormann
group. As discussed in previous
programs, circumstantial evidence suggests that the Bush family may well be the
American “point element” for that remarkable and deadly organization. (For more about the Bush family and the
Bormann organization, see, among other programs, FTR#’s 273, 278.)
1.
This program begins with background discussion of “nation-building” in
the United States by elements associated with the Underground Reich. The Bush family’s history is inextricably
linked with that of the Third Reich.
W’s great grandfather (George Herbert Walker) was one of Hitler’s
earliest financial backers. Walker
(whose last name is the President’s middle name) brought his son-in-law,
Prescott Bush Sr., into his Nazi-linked businesses. The program reviews the role of Sullivan & Cromwell attorney
Allen Dulles in attempting to mask the Bush family's Nazi assets, as well as
highlighting the confiscation of several of those companies by the Alien
Property Custodian during World War II.
(The Secret War Against the Jews:
How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish
People; John Loftus and Mark Aarons; Copyright 1994 [HC]; St. Martin’s
Press; ISBN 0-312-11057-X; pp. 360-61.)
2.
It should be noted that the postwar liquidation of the Union Banking
Corporation (one of the Bush Nazi-linked businesses) provided much of the
capital foundation for the Bush family’s postwar economic endeavors. Another (the Hamburg-Amerika line) became a
key element of the Bormann organization.
(For more about the Bush family Nazi businesses, see Miscellaneous Archive Show M11, as well
as FTR#’s 186, 248, 273, 278. For more about the U.S. industrial
connections to Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, see RFA#’s 1, 2, 10, 37, Miscellaneous
Archive Show M42, FTR#’s 36-38, 219.)
The economic and political component of a Third Reich gone underground,
the Bormann organization controls corporate Germany and much of the rest of the
world. [It was created and run by
Martin Bormann, the organizational genius who was the “the power behind the
throne” in Nazi Germany.] The Bormann
group is a primary element of the analysis presented in the For the Record programs. (A synoptic view of the Bormann group is
presented in FTR#305.) For more about the Bormann organization,
see: FTR#’s 87, 90, 99, 102, 120, 122,
123, 125, 127, 134, 145, 152, 155, 158, 177, 179, 180, 187, 189, 193, 194, 195,
200, 215, 216, 218, 219, 224, 226, 232, 233, 234, 235, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242,
245, 248, 250, 251, 261, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 278, 283, 286, 292, 293, 294,
298, 299, 300, 302, 303, 305, 309, 313, 322, 327, 331, 335, 342, 343, 344, 345.)
3.
Next, the program reviews Allen Dulles’ pivotal role in helping to
boost Ibn Saud to the throne of Saudi Arabia, and their mutual connection to
British fascist Jack Philby and the Third Reich. (Ibid.; p. 21.) (For more on this subject, see also: FTR#’s 216, 332.)
4.
Dulles, in turn, utilized his political protégé Richard Nixon to help
import Nazis and Third Reich collaborators into the United States to counter
what the Republicans felt was excessive “Jewish influence” in the American
electorate. (Ibid.; p. 122.) (For more about this operation, see also: RFA#37, Miscellaneous Archive Show M24,
FTR#’s 29, 48, 113, 186, 248.)
5.
The principal spokesperson for this operation (the Crusade For Freedom)
was Ronald Reagan and the official principally involved in arranging for the
fascists to emigrate to the U.S. was William Casey, campaign manager for the
Reagan/Bush campaign in 1980 and Reagan’s CIA director. (Ibid.; p. 605.)
6.
A major element in the Crusade For Freedom was the resettlement of an
entire SS intelligence unit (the Vorkommando Moskau) in the New York/New Jersey
area to counteract “Jewish influence” in that region. (Ibid.; p. 496.)
7.
When Nixon became president, the Nazi émigrés were permanently
incorporated into the Republican Party.
The chairman of the Republican National Committee who oversaw this
incorporation was the elder George Bush.
(Ibid.; pp. 369-71.)
8.
Turning to the present, the program highlights the fact that most of
the Al-Queda prisoners in Cuba are Saudi nationals. (“Detainees Are Mostly Saudis” by Carl Nolte; San Francisco Chronicle; 1/19/2002; pp.
A1-A10.) Despite this fact and the
Saudi nationality of 15 of 19 hijackers, Bush did not name Saudi Arabia as part
of the “axis of evil.”
9.
The program supplements previous discussion about the Saudi involvement
with Al Queda, highlighting the analysis of one U.S. diplomat that the United
States had, in effect, become the hired mercenaries of the Saudis. (“Annals of
National Security: King’s Ransom” by Seymour Hersh; The New Yorker; 10/22/2001; accessed at www.newyorker.com/FACT/?011022fa_FACT1.) (For more about apparent Saudi involvement
in the 9/11 attacks, see also: FTR#’s
329, 330, 331, 334, 337, 341, 342, 343, 344.)
10. Next, the program reviews an
element of discussion from past broadcasts: the World Muslim Congress
(WMC). (The Beast Reawakens; Martin A. Lee; Copyright 1997 [HC]; Little,
Brown & Co.; ISBN 0-316-51959-6; pp. 225-226.) A key player in the Afghan war against the Soviets, this
organization embraces the convergence of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the
Saudi government and royal family, American neo-Nazis and elements of U.S.
intelligence. (Idem.) (For more about the WMC, see FTR#’s 328, 329, 330, 340. For more about the Grand Mufti, see also: FTR#’s 332, 333, 341, 343, 344, as well
as the other programs cited in the descriptions for these broadcasts.)
11. The military buildup being
requested by Bush is projected as rivaling that requisitioned by Reagan. (“Bush Wants $120 Billion Budget Boost for
Pentagon” by James Dao [New York Times];
San Francisco Chronicle; 2/2/2002; p.
A11.) Mr. Emory underscores that, in combination with Bush’s tax cuts
(scheduled to take effect incrementally over the next several years) the
military buildup will recapitulate the enormous deficit spending of the Reagan
/Bush administrations. These deficits,
in combination with the realization of the Euro, will do immense damage to the
United States. (The enormous debt
incurred by the Reagan administrations and the first Bush administration was
managed by borrowing against the dollars held as reserve currency. In addition to being (probably) a weak
currency, thereby making U.S. manufacturing exports relatively expensive for
Europeans to buy, the Euro will erode the dollar’s status as a reserve
currency. One should not lose sight of
the fact that Bin Laden called for his followers to attack America’s economic
strength. It is Mr. Emory’s belief that
Bin Laden and the Bush administration
are controlled by the Underground Reich.
Bush’s fiscal policy will do
enormous damage to the United States.
In the short run, the Bush defense program (like that of Reagan) will
constitute a sort of “military Keynesianism.”
(One should remember that Reagan’s military build-up was justified by
the Saudi/Bush/CIA concocting of the phony “oil shortage” of 1979-80. For more about this subject, see FTR#’s 29, 214, 337.) In the short term, Americans will be put to
work manufacturing weapons. Mr. Emory
also notes that the high-tech industry of the Silicon Valley (Democrat-friendly
in recent years) may be put to work making high-tech anti-terror
technology. Bush’s proposed missile shield
will be channeling a considerable amount of money (and jobs) to Southern
California’s aerospace industry. This
might be viewed as an element of domestic nation-building, with California
having been a bastion of Democratic electoral strength in recent years.
12. Next the program highlights
the extent to which the Bush political agenda benefits companies connected to
his family and associates. A major
beneficiary of the Bush defense build-up will be the Carlyle Group, intimately
connected to the Bush family and involving key Saudi “petrodollar” associates
of the Bush milieu, up until recently including the Bin Ladens. (“Crony Capitalism, U.S.A.” by Paul Krugman;
New York Times; 1/15/2002; p.
A23.) (For more about the Carlyle
Group, see FTR#’s 329, 334, 337, 341,
342, 347. For more about the Bush
family business connections to Bin Laden’s family, see FTR#’s 182, 186, 248, 256, 277, 292, 308, 310, 315, 319, 322, 325, 345.)
13. In addition to Bush’s
defense policy, his education program may well benefit his siblings and their Saudi business associates. FTR#345
presented information about a recent conference in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, at
which the Bin Ladens (among others) expressed anxiety about their U.S. business
ties. Bush’s younger brother Neil was using that (in part) Bin
Laden-sponsored conference to recruit Saudi investors for his new educational
software company, which figures to be a beneficiary of his brother’s education
program. (“Neil Bush’s Saudi Business Connection” by Michael Isikoff; Newsweek; 2/4/2002; p. 6.) (For Neil Bush’s involvement in the Savings
and Loan scandal, see Miscellaneous
Archive Show, as well as FTR#249.)
14. In the context of
nation-building in the United States, the program examines the bombing of the
U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998 as a discreditation of the Clinton
administration both at home and abroad.
(For more about these attacks, see FTR#’s
342, 344.) The bombings were
designed to interdict a rapprochement between the Islamic fundamentalist regime
of Sudan and the U.S. (Dollars for Terror: The United States and
Islam; Richard Labeviere; Copyright 2000 [SC]; Algora Publishing; ISBN
1-892941-06-6; p. 349.)
15. Whereas many African, Middle
Eastern and Islamic countries condemned the Clinton administration’s assessment
that the Al Shifa pharmaceutical plant was connected to Al Queda and being used
to manufacture chemical weapons, that
was, in fact, the case. (Ibid.; p. 358.)
16. In that context, one should
remember that Khalid Bin Mahfouz, whose family is connected to the BCCI, the
Bush family (through Carlyle Group and Arbusto energy, and to Bin Laden milieu,
was closely connected to the owner of the plant. (Ibid.; pp. 359-60.)
17. In addition to being used to
attack Clinton abroad at a time when he was facing impeachment at home, the
attack was attributed by the Muslim Brotherhood to Clinton’s desire to distract
from his domestic problems stemming from the Lewinsky scandal. (Ibid.; p. 367.) (FTR#343 focuses on
the Muslim Brotherhood’s historical connections to the Third Reich, its
“Islamofascist” character, its alleged involvement in terrorism and its alleged
involvement with Al Queda.)
18. Mr. Emory then summarizes a
cynical, Machiavellian relationship between the Republican establishment, the
Israeli right, and the Palestinian negotiating team. It is Mr. Emory’s view that this relationship was instrumental in
destabilizing Clinton’s foreign policy and weakening his domestic political
consensus. (For more about the Israeli
right’s historical relationship with fascism, see Miscellaneous Archive Shows M30, M58, FTR#’s 94, 252. For
discussion of the Republicans’ dalliance with the Israeli right, see FTR#’s 94, 139, 252, as well as L#8.
For analysis of the possible manipulation of the 2000 Camp David peace
talks by the Republicans, see FTR#’s
334, 337, 340.)
19. Correction: Mr. Emory misstates the
dispute between Clinton and the Republicans.
The Republicans tried to move the
U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
Yitzhak Rabin and Clinton viewed this as inimical to the peace process,
and the legislation passed by the Republican dominated Congress was vetoed. (Ibid.; p. 167.)
20. The discussion concludes
with an excerpting of a text by James Stewart Martin, who was in charge of the
Economic Warfare Division of the anti-trust division of the Department of
Justice during World War II. Martin’s task was to interdict the
German-American industrial and financial axis of which the Bush family was an
integral part. He was unsuccessful in
doing so. He concluded the 300 page
book he wrote about his experience with a warning about the economic and
political conditions that made the rise of Hitler possible. “The ecopolitical masters of Germany boosted
Hitler and his program into the driver’s seat at a time when the tide in the
political fight between the Nazis and the supporters of the Weimar Republic was
swinging against the Nazis. All of the
men who mattered in banking and industrial circles could quickly agree on one
program and throw their financial weight behind it. Their support won the
election for the Nazis. We must assume
that the same thing is not yet true in the United States. We do have economic power so concentrated
that it would lie in the power of not more than a hundred men—if they could
agree among themselves—to throw the same kind of combined economic weight
behind a single program. They have not
agreed yet. . . .If the United States should run into serious economic
difficulties, however, most of the conditions for a re-enactment of the German
drama would already exist on the American stage. The slight differences within the camp of the fraternity then may
be the only real barrier to the kind of integration of the financial and
industrial community behind a single repressive program, like that which the
financiers and industrialists of Germany executed through Hitler. Are we safe in assuming that it would take a
grave economic crisis to precipitate the dangers inherent in economic
concentration? The basic integration of
the financial and industrial groups in the United States is evident when we
look at the increase of concentration in the past few years.” (All
Honorable Men; James Stewart Martin; Copyright 1950 [HC]; Little, Brown
& Co.; p. 295.)
21. A column cited earlier in
the program points that the situation that Martin warned about is dangerously present under the Bush
administration. “It was CBSMarket
Watch’s executive editor, not some whining political commentator, who warned
that ‘a small group of business leaders exert enormous clout over Bush and his
team in getting the rules changed to their benefit.’” (“Crony Capitalism, U.S.A.” by Paul Krugman; New York Times; 1/15/2002; p. A23.)
22. Again echoing James Stewart
Martin’s warning to the world, Mr. Emory quotes the last paragraph of his 1950
book. “The moral of this is not that
Germany is an inevitable menace, but that there are forces in our own country
which can make Germany a menace. And,
more importantly, they could create a menace of their own here at home, not
through a deliberate plot to bring about a political catastrophe but as a calm
judgment of ‘business necessity.’ The
men who would do this are not Nazis, but businessmen; not criminals, but
honorable men.” (All Honorable Men; p. 300.)
(The first broadcast of Mr. Emory’s programs
takes place at 9pm [Pacific Time] on Monday evenings. To listen on the web, check the instructions on the KKUP-FM web
site at www.kkup.com.)